View the following video

  • Watch the first 25 minutes of the following webinar on the Yurok people:
    • Parliament of the World’s Religions. (2012, Mar 22). Earth-based Spirituality: An Indigenous Paradigm [Video file]. Retrieved from

Prompt

1). Using the video you viewed as a reference point, identify, define, and explain at least two major beliefs or concepts central to the religious tradition(s) discussed.

3). Describe an example of how these beliefs are expressed in practice.

4). Thoroughly explain how the religion illustrates at least two of the common elements of Indigenous religions discussed in this Unit. Be sure to explain what these elements are!

5). Finally, briefly compare and contrast the religion with that of the Aborigines of Australia discussed in this week’s readings and unit material.

Important Information

To sufficiently cover the topic, your response should be a minimum of one and half pages long.

The rubric used to grade this assignment is below these instructions. Please review the rubric before beginning your assignment. This can save you a lot of time and heartache!

Format your paper using APA, MLA, or Chicago style. At the very least, double-space, use a 12pt font, and 1-inch margins.

Properly cite any sources used in your research.

Assignment Rubric

Assignment Rubric

CriteriaRatings Pts

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePrompts Addressed _8417

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

All prompts are responded to and the responses are supported by thorough explanation and interesting, creative, or original examples.

blank

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Proficient

All prompts are responded to and the responses are supported by sufficient explanation and appropriate examples.

19891_4381

Edit ratingDelete rating

3.0 to >1.0 pts

Developing

All or most of the prompts are adequately addressed but responses are only minimally supported or explained.

19891_9570

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.0 to >0 pts

Insufficient

The assignment is incomplete or does not address a majority of the prompts. When prompts are addressed, responses are not clearly presented or adequately explained. Responses may also be completely superficial and/or a mere regurgitation or what was contained in assigned course materials.

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 6.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCourse Content 19891_1205

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

6.0 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Concepts, practices, terminology, and major figures relating to the assignment are accurately identified, described, and explained in a clear and thorough way.

19891_8016

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Proficient

Concepts, practices, terminology, and major figures relating to the assignment are accurately identified, described, and explained.

19891_2758

Edit ratingDelete rating

3.0 to >1.0 pts

Developing

Nearly all concepts, practices, terminology, and major figures relating to the assignment are adequately identified, described, and explained.

19891_9095

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.0 to >0 pts

Insufficient

Hardly any or no concepts, practices, terminology, and major figures relating to the assignment are accurately identified, described, or explained. The assignment is not turned in or is incomplete.

19891_3980

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 6.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical and Creative Thinking 19891_9922

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

4.0 to >3.0 pts

Excellent

The assignment demonstrates clear and thorough analysis of the concepts and problems involved and a clear, thorough, and creative explication of original thought regarding the ideas and issues discussed.

19891_7961

Edit ratingDelete rating

3.0 to >2.0 pts

Proficient

The assignment demonstrate standard analysis of the concepts and problems involved and a clear and thorough explication of original thought regarding the ideas and issues discussed.

19891_6504

Edit ratingDelete rating

2.0 to >1.0 pts

Developing

The assignment demonstrates adequate but unoriginal analysis of the concepts and problems involved and an underdeveloped explication of original thought regarding the ideas and issues discussed.

19891_3653

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.0 to >0 pts

Insufficient

The assignment does not demonstrate adequate analysis or original thought of the concepts or problems involved in the discussion.

19891_9817

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 4.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAssignment Requirements 19891_990Formatting, sources cited, page length, etc.

view longer description

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

2.0 to >1.75 pts

Excellent

Assignment requirements have been met and there are no issues with formatting, sources cited, or page length.

19891_1603

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.75 to >1.5 pts

Proficient

Assignment requirements have been met and there are hardly any issues with formatting, sources cited, or page length.

19891_4167

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.5 to >1.0 pts

Developing

Nearly all assignment requirements have been met, and there are only a few issues with formatting, sources cited, or page length.

19891_8942

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.0 to >0 pts

Insufficient

Assignment requirements have not been met. There are severe issues with formatting, citations, or page length.

19891_4690

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 2.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Conventions 19891_6525

threshold: pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

2.0 to >1.75 pts

Excellent

The assignment is excellently structured, coherent, and fluid. There are no grammatical or spelling errors.

19891_6288

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.75 to >1.5 pts

Proficient

The assignment is well structured and coherent. There are not many grammatical or spelling errors. Errors do not distract the reader from the assignment content.

19891_7921

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.5 to >1.0 pts

Developing

The assignment is adequately structured and mostly coherent. There are numerous spelling and grammatical errors that distract the reader from the assignment content.

19891_3732

Edit ratingDelete rating

1.0 to >0 pts

Insufficient

The assignment is not turned in, is unintelligible, or the problems of a developing assignment are overly severe or numerous.

19891_7330

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 2.0 pts

Additional Comments

Edit criterion descriptionDelete criterion row

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of criterion

threshold: 5 pts

Edit ratingDelete rating

5to >0 pts

Full Marks

blank

Edit ratingDelete rating

0to >0 pts

No Marks

blank_2

This area will be used by the assessor to leave comments related to this criterion.

pts

/ 5 pts

Additional Comments

Total Points: 20.0

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

If this is not the paper you were searching for, you can order your 100% plagiarism free, professional written paper now!

Order Now Just Browsing

All of our assignments are originally produced, unique, and free of plagiarism.

Free Revisions Plagiarism Free 24x7 Support