In “Protecting Freedom of Expression at Harvard,” in chapter two of Everything’s an Argument, Derek Bok writes, “One reason why the power of censorship is so dangerous is that it is extremely difficult to decide when a particular communication is offensive enough to warrant prohibition or to weigh the degree of offensiveness against the potential value of communication. If we begin to forbid flags, it is only a short step to prohibiting offensive speakers.” Do you agree with this statement? What is the writer’s stance in his essay? Does he argue effectively? Do you think his solutions are weak and in conflict with his stance? What about the last part of the above quote? Would you say it is a fallacy? If it is, which one is it and why?

 
"Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code "Newclient"

If this is not the paper you were searching for, you can order your 100% plagiarism free, professional written paper now!

Order Now Just Browsing

All of our assignments are originally produced, unique, and free of plagiarism.

Free Revisions Plagiarism Free 24x7 Support